December 26th, 2006 by: Ashley
Louisville and Seattle schools hoping to maintain ability to racially integrate students
.jpg)
4.25″ x 11″ watercolor, Seattle skyline
SOLD
See all paintings available for sale.
From the classroom to the conference room, racial diversity is a term carefully studied and implemented. My takeaway from this concept is that it’s strived for and regarded is a mark of excellence. But the means of getting there are not as morally clear as the end result itself.
Earlier this month, two cases were heard by the Supreme Court regarding affirmative action voluntarily utilized by public schools in both Louisville, KY and Seattle, WA to create racial integration. The 1954 case of Brown vs. the Board of Education led to actions ensuring schools opened their doors to all students. Schools, like many in Louisville and Seattle, continue to implement such practices. In these cities, race is one of many factors considered in deciding where a child attends school. This might result in denied acceptance to the school of a student’s choice because no more room is available for a student of their race.
To some, this practice seems noble, especially when many communities self-segregate. Since racial diversity is so highly regarded, we owe it to our children to secure that their lives are not void of people of other ethnicities, right? Apparently, that depends on who you ask.
Seeing racial integration through to fruition without bringing into question what is unconstitutional is not clear (per the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment). Should a student be denied acceptance to a school in his or her own neighborhood because their race “quota” has been maxed out? On the flipside, should we allow for segregation to potentially grow organically if communities are left mold their own student body? How do you achieve racial integration without racial means? Is it truly academically beneficial to a student to attend an integrated school? Who is to judge? These are all tough questions with no easy answers.
Supposedly, all public schools are equal, so it shouldn’t matter which school a child attends. Anyone who believes this has clearly not stepped foot into two schools on opposite sides of any city. The intention is good, but the ironic method to achieve it, using race to eliminate discrimination by race, is debatably ethical.
There seems to be a split down the middle of opinions on the topic. So, in the spirit of constructive debate, I invite your thoughts. Where would you stand if your child were placed in these circumstances? What if you were the same parent, only you had experienced, first-hand, the Civil Rights Movement as a minority? Please share your stance and/or personal experience.


Hand crafted art, sugar rimmed Martinis, Godiva Chocolate, solo guitar, and Santa; the 

